[oops. ejected prematurely into the cybersphere.]
Yoshie Furuhashi wrote: > In my replies to Doug and the Sandwichman, I suggested that the > tendency to prioritize women as victims (i.e., not as agents, > history-makers) rather than ordinary concerns of ordinary women may be > a position that marginalizes both [unnamed] male leftists and [unnamed] US feminists.
I'd say that the normal tendency of the [unnamed] feminists in the US is _not_ to treat US women as victims, at least when talking about their peers. Instead, they are agents of an individualistic sort, striving to be "economic men." That's because the kind of feminism that's tended to survive on the overt level during these evil times (akin to what Wilhelm Reich called "the moral plague") has been of the bourgeois or professional sort.
On the other hand, this flavor of feminism has tended to treat women outside of the US as victims. (I'm thinking of those liberal feminists who sided with the US in Afghanistan in the name of fighting sexism.) This is the usual dichotomy: we are agents here, but _they_ are victims. This dichotomy also is applied to the class divide: we are agents, but working-class women are victims, kept from realizing their ability to be economic men.
That tendency exists, especially among the kinds of feminists called individual-right feminists (championed by conservatives) and "power feminists," "third-wave feminists," etc. (terms characterizing a younger set), but it seems to me that the more common attitude is to see women in general as actual and potential victims, specifically of men's violence.
Alas, I'm not enough of an expert on the debates among feminists to name names.
Feminists who are well known enough to be named are a minority among feminists. The subject might be a topic in a subgenre of sociology, social movement research, but from what I know, no one has undertaken such a study that would give you the kind of precision you seem to demand. There are a lot of studies of Western feminist and leftist attitudes toward non-whites (as immigrant workers or colonial subjects) by historians, though, which are germane to the topic. -- Yoshie <http://montages.blogspot.com/> <http://mrzine.org> <http://monthlyreview.org/>
- Re: Fwd: [off-list] campus feminism, (continued)
- Re: Fwd: [off-list] campus feminism, Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 05 Nov 2006, 16:55 GMT
- GLBT Individuals, Undocumented Workers, and the Disabled, Yoshie Furuhashi Sat 04 Nov 2006, 21:40 GMT
- Re: GLBT Individuals, Undocumented Workers, and the Disabled, Jim Devine Sat 04 Nov 2006, 21:52 GMT
- Re: GLBT Individuals, Undocumented Workers, and the Disabled, Jim Devine Sat 04 Nov 2006, 22:09 GMT
- Re: GLBT Individuals, Undocumented Workers, and the Disabled, Yoshie Furuhashi Sat 04 Nov 2006, 22:51 GMT
- Galaudet was Re: [PEN-L] GLBT Individuals, ..., Doyle Saylor Sun 05 Nov 2006, 03:45 GMT
- Friendly Fire files: Strafed school gets Pentagon aid, Leigh Meyers Sat 04 Nov 2006, 19:27 GMT
- Re: Friendly Fire files: Strafed school gets Pentagon aid, Michael Perelman Sat 04 Nov 2006, 21:20 GMT
- male leftists, Doug Henwood Sat 04 Nov 2006, 18:59 GMT