PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Process (was Third Worldism
From: Yoshie F.
In all revolutions in practice, though, it's been the case that each class
and strata within it were politically divided (the degree of division
differing from class to class, the ruling class being the most united
class), and revolutions assumed the character of struggles between political
factions each of which consisted of multiple classes. The dictatorship
therefore in practice meant the
dictatorship of one faction over the other factions, and its
traditional political vehicle was a one-party state in which other
parties and factions were either outlawed or at best tolerated.
^^^^^
CB; Wasn't the proletariat so small in the SU that it probably wasn't that
divided ? And then was there some actuality to the cross-class unity of the
"hammer and sickle" ?
- Thread context:
- Re: Any IIs or IIIs on this list?, (continued)
- Violence flares in Oaxaca,
Leigh Meyers Fri 03 Nov 2006, 02:45 GMT
- Liberal Plutocracy (was Process),
Yoshie Furuhashi Fri 03 Nov 2006, 00:05 GMT
- Process (was Third Worldism,
Charles Brown Thu 02 Nov 2006, 23:01 GMT
- NYT: Ex-Chief at Software Maker Gets 12-Year Prison Term,
ravi Thu 02 Nov 2006, 22:16 GMT
- Spenglerianism from an unlikely quarter,
Louis Proyect Thu 02 Nov 2006, 22:15 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]