PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Process (was Third Worldism)
On Oct 31, 2006, at 3:10 PM, Carrol Cox wrote:
Hence a breaking of that hegemony is or ought to be of some concern to
revolutionaries (or even radical reformers) in the U.S. I don't
think we
can do it without a great deal of help from the forces in the world
which Yoshie is trying to identify. She may or may not be making the
correct identification, but she is certainly engaged in a vital
revolutionary task.
So while you're passing magisterial judgment, Cde Cox, what do you
think of her generalizations about "Western leftists"? You usually
frown on that sort of thing - does she get a free pass?
Doug
- Thread context:
- Re: Process (was Third Worldism), (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Process (was Third Worldism),
Louis Proyect Tue 31 Oct 2006, 15:37 GMT
- Re: Process (was Third Worldism),
Yoshie Furuhashi Tue 31 Oct 2006, 15:58 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: Process (was Third Worldism),
Louis Proyect Tue 31 Oct 2006, 16:12 GMT
- Re: Process (was Third Worldism),
Carrol Cox Tue 31 Oct 2006, 20:10 GMT
- Re: Process (was Third Worldism),
Doug Henwood Tue 31 Oct 2006, 20:25 GMT
- Re: Process (was Third Worldism),
Yoshie Furuhashi Tue 31 Oct 2006, 22:58 GMT
Process (was Third Worldism),
Charles Brown Thu 02 Nov 2006, 23:17 GMT
Process (was Third Worldism),
Charles Brown Thu 02 Nov 2006, 23:30 GMT
Process (was Third Worldism),
Charles Brown Thu 02 Nov 2006, 23:43 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]