Process (was Third Worldism)

To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Process (was Third Worldism)
From: Charles Brown <cbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:35:17 -0500
Thread-index: Acb8a0sOaMhzQnw2SjOwEQJu0Tkd0g==

         Louis Pro  wrote:

        > The concept of a dictatorship of the proletariat seems fairly
central to Marxism, doesn't it?

^^^^

CB:     When a phrase can be applied so universally, might it lose its
scientific precision ?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Process (was Third Worldism)
  - From: Jim Devine
- Re: Process (was Third Worldism)
  - From: Louis Proyect
- Re: Process (was Third Worldism)
  - From: Doug Henwood

Prev by Date: Re: Stan Goff on fascism/ process logic of a reactionary bourgeois democracy
Next by Date: Re: Suffrage in Switzerland (was Third Worldism)
Previous by thread: Re: Process (was Third Worldism)
Next by thread: Re: Process (was Third Worldism)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Process (was Third Worldism), (continued)
  - Re: Process (was Third Worldism), Yoshie Furuhashi Mon 30 Oct 2006, 03:59 GMT
  - Re: Process (was Third Worldism), Michael Perelman Mon 30 Oct 2006, 04:09 GMT
    - Re: Process (was Third Worldism), Leigh Meyers Mon 30 Oct 2006, 04:32 GMT
      
      Re: Process (was Third Worldism), Yoshie Furuhashi Mon 30 Oct 2006, 11:46 GMT
  - Process (was Third Worldism), Charles Brown Mon 30 Oct 2006, 21:34 GMT
    - Re: Process (was Third Worldism), Doug Henwood Mon 30 Oct 2006, 21:36 GMT
      
      Re: Process (was Third Worldism), Leigh Meyers Tue 31 Oct 2006, 06:09 GMT
      
      Re: Process (was Third Worldism), Carrol Cox Tue 31 Oct 2006, 15:47 GMT
      
      Re: Process (was Third Worldism), Jim Devine Tue 31 Oct 2006, 16:15 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]