Hypothesis:
Socialist regimes result from a revolutionary movement, and the leadership of such states consists (for the most part) in those who achieved leadership within the revolutionary movement at an early stage. The 'problem'* then is to be found in the conditions which generate the leadership of embryonic socialist movements. Hence the question "Why so few women in the leadership of socialist states" can be seen to be _identical_ with the question, "Why so few women on lbo, pen-l, and marxism list?
Carrol
Frankly, I am surprised to see the question posed in this fashion at all. Back in the 1970s, radical feminists were always taunted with the examples of Indira Ghandi, Golda Meir et al. At one point I would have been surprised to hear an echo of that from Yoshie, but after hearing hear laud Ahmadinejad's call for Iranian women to breed solid citizens for the Islamic Republic, nothing should surprise me.
- Re: feminism, (continued)
- Re: feminism, Doyle Saylor Sun 15 Oct 2006, 19:36 GMT
- Re: feminism, Gassler Robert Sun 15 Oct 2006, 08:37 GMT
- Socialism and Women's Leadership (was China Drafts Law to Boost Unions and End Labor Abuse), Yoshie Furuhashi Sat 14 Oct 2006, 15:57 GMT
- Re: Socialism and Women's Leadership (was China Drafts Law to Boost Unionsand End Labor Abuse), Carrol Cox Sat 14 Oct 2006, 16:22 GMT
- Re: Socialism and Women's Leadership (was China Drafts Law to Boost Unionsand End Labor Abuse), Louis Proyect Sat 14 Oct 2006, 16:57 GMT
- Re: Socialism and Women's Leadership (was China Drafts Law to Boost Unionsand End Labor Abuse), Doyle Saylor Sat 14 Oct 2006, 17:19 GMT
- Re: Socialism and Women's Leadership (was China Drafts Law to Boost Unionsand End Labor Abuse), Yoshie Furuhashi Sat 14 Oct 2006, 17:23 GMT
- Re: Socialism and Women's Leadership (was China Drafts Law to Boost Unionsand End Labor Abuse), Doug Henwood Sat 14 Oct 2006, 17:30 GMT
- Re: Socialism and Women's Leadership (was China Drafts Law to Boost Unionsand End Labor Abuse), Yoshie Furuhashi Sat 14 Oct 2006, 17:41 GMT