Greetings Economists, Does this mean we can give oscars to everyone so they live four years longer? On Oct 14, 2006, at 8:32 AM, Jim Devine wrote:
> "people who win Oscars live 4 years longer than people who are > nominated but fail to win."
that'd be nice, but then the Oscars would mean even less than they do now, even to the actors (etc.) The Academy Awards are in many ways a popularity contest.
-- Jim Devine / "To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole." -- Nuremberg Tribunal
- Re: Socialism and Women's Leadership (was China Drafts Law to Boost Unions and End Labor Abuse), (continued)
- Re: Socialism and Women's Leadership (was China Drafts Law to Boost Unions and End Labor Abuse), Doyle Saylor Sat 14 Oct 2006, 16:36 GMT
- Death of actors, Doyle Saylor Sat 14 Oct 2006, 15:24 GMT
- Re: Death of actors, Jim Devine Sat 14 Oct 2006, 15:33 GMT
- Re: Death of actors, Doyle Saylor Sat 14 Oct 2006, 15:51 GMT
- Re: Death of actors, Jim Devine Sat 14 Oct 2006, 15:58 GMT
- Re: Death of actors, Doyle Saylor Sat 14 Oct 2006, 16:28 GMT
- Re: Death of actors, Sandwichman Sat 14 Oct 2006, 16:29 GMT
- Re: Death of actors, Doyle Saylor Sat 14 Oct 2006, 16:38 GMT
- mst on 2nd round, michael a. lebowitz Sat 14 Oct 2006, 14:40 GMT