PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Fetal Protection and Workplace Discrimination Against Women
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Fetal Protection and Workplace Discrimination Against Women
- From: Yoshie Furuhashi <critical.montages@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:38:16 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NsaNcJCCldnBxjbPNXnpKZ0zfYn4A1ybyskk5y9kdDRRvxLlRsBsApMIHsM35NdlPI6EQJXAdx7iaU11aQ1IQ3OKB01Y9KE3byEUea60Eb27D/Dc90oi6hJVow8gymBW5CoEGSE4bOw5fdDQaWNWG0WYF5HE8x+nMV/OlNeltB8=
On 9/30/06, Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This policy was designed to protect corps against
suits for damaging fetuses -- to
protect the corps, not the fetuses.
Sure, fetuses are just political footballs, as always. They used
fetuses to exclude women from higher-paying male-dominated jobs,
whereas women weren't excluded from jobs ideologically regarded as
suitable for women, even though a number of such "women's jobs"
exposed women workers to occupational hazards that endanger
reproductive health as well.
Now that worst discrimination has been banned, and a movement for
"fetal rights" has legally taken off, the time is ripe for
anti-abortionists to go after women who take dangerous jobs on the
grounds that they, like pregnant women who use drugs, endanger their
fetuses.
--
Yoshie
<http://montages.blogspot.com/>
<http://mrzine.org>
<http://monthlyreview.org/>
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]