what's crucial at this point, it seems, is whether people _feel_ that they are affected by a recession before the election in November and then vote on that basis. (Official stats are really only important if they jibe with personal experience.)
The US term strucrure of interest rates has been inverted since July 17, 2006 although the degree of inversion as measured by the difference between the 3-month and 10-Year rates (CMTs) has been fluctuating from worse to worser to worse to worser over the course of these two and a half months. It is getting worser again.
On top of that, NYT reports today that August 2006 has been the first month since 1993 in which the year on year median house price change is negative.
To that add the hedge fund Amarath's implosion and its currently invisible after shock effects.
Given all these indicators and our knowledge of history, that we are entering into a recession is almost guaranteed now, unless a miracle occurs. We may even be in recession but we cannot know this since it is the guys at NBER who will tell us that. ...
-- Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
- Re: interesting experiment, (continued)
- Re: interesting experiment, Michael Perelman Tue 26 Sep 2006, 03:39 GMT
- Why Won't Bill Frist Answer The Question?, Leigh Meyers Mon 25 Sep 2006, 22:20 GMT
- recession?, Jim Devine Mon 25 Sep 2006, 21:53 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- recession?, Sabri Oncu Wed 27 Sep 2006, 03:17 GMT
- Re: recession?, Jim Devine Wed 27 Sep 2006, 15:15 GMT
- Re: recession?, Sabri Oncu Thu 28 Sep 2006, 00:27 GMT
- Re: recession?, Jim Devine Thu 28 Sep 2006, 02:32 GMT
- Re: recession?, Sabri Oncu Thu 28 Sep 2006, 08:11 GMT
- Re: recession?, Jim Devine Thu 28 Sep 2006, 13:28 GMT