Re: Origins of Money

To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Origins of Money
From: Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 16:25:02 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

Let's not forget Knapp's state money theory.

On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 03:48:08PM -0700, Jim Devine wrote:
>
> Doug, I think you're falling for the textbook barter vs. money
> dichotomy fallacy. It really should a be barter-exchange vs.
> money-based exchange vs. non-exchange systems choice.

--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
michaelperelman.wordpress.com

References:
- Origins of Money
  - From: Jim Devine

Prev by Date: "Anti-GM Fundamentalism"? (was Cuba)
Next by Date: You Da' Mann!
Previous by thread: Origins of Money
Next by thread: Re: Origins of Money
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: "Anti-GM Fundamentalism"? (was Cuba), (continued)
- Origins of Money, Jim Devine Sat 12 Aug 2006, 22:48 GMT
  - Re: Origins of Money, Michael Perelman Sat 12 Aug 2006, 23:24 GMT
  - Re: Origins of Money, Carrol Cox Sun 13 Aug 2006, 01:11 GMT
  - Re: Origins of Money, Doug Henwood Sun 13 Aug 2006, 02:15 GMT
    - Re: Origins of Money, Michael Perelman Sun 13 Aug 2006, 04:35 GMT
      
      Re: Origins of Money, Ted Winslow Sun 13 Aug 2006, 12:49 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]