isn't it easier to look at the ADA and the Union of Conservative Assholes ratings?
At around 11/8/06 11:48 am, Michael Hoover wrote: > > Lieberman's record of approximately 90% "party line" votes in the > Senate includes (as it does for all members) those in which the two > parties have taken the same position. About 40% of the votes for the > years that I've looked at thus far fall into this category. Put > another way, he votes about 40% of the time with Republicans (as do > many other Democratic senators). >
But more interesting (than your last sentence), if I am getting your numbers right (and doing my math right), his "real" party line voting reduces to 83% i.e., when there is a conflict, he sides with the Republicans 17% of the time. Is this right? Do you plan to publish your findings somewhere?
Thanks,
--ravi
-- Support something better than yourself: ;-) PeTA: http://www.peta.org/ GreenPeace: http://www.greenpeace.org/ If you have nothing better to do: http://platosbeard.org/
-- Jim Devine / "It is however always important to remember that the ability to see things in their correct perspective may be, and often is, divorced from the ability to reason correctly and vice versa. That is why an economist may be a very good theorist and yet talk absolute nonsense...." -- Joseph Schumpeter [edited]
- Re: Last Lieberman Lament?, (continued)
- Re: Last Lieberman Lament?, Michael Perelman Fri 11 Aug 2006, 16:08 GMT
- Re: Last Lieberman Lament?, Jim Devine Fri 11 Aug 2006, 16:12 GMT
- Re: Last Lieberman Lament?, Yoshie Furuhashi Fri 11 Aug 2006, 16:32 GMT
- Re: Last Lieberman Lament?, ravi Fri 11 Aug 2006, 17:04 GMT
- Re: Last Lieberman Lament?, Jim Devine Fri 11 Aug 2006, 17:47 GMT
- Re: Last Lieberman Lament?, Max B. Sawicky Fri 11 Aug 2006, 18:11 GMT
- Re: Last Lieberman Lament?, Yoshie Furuhashi Fri 11 Aug 2006, 18:25 GMT
- Re: Last Lieberman Lament?, Michael Hoover Sun 13 Aug 2006, 15:34 GMT
- Re: Last Lieberman Lament?, Michael Hoover Sun 13 Aug 2006, 15:25 GMT