PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Last Lieberman Lament?
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Last Lieberman Lament?
- From: Jim Devine <jdevine03@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:11:14 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GX3DgB2iwaRffdGD5h8PB7kT3cdqpofWFhRfUk5gqgvDiMDsDGr/JVF0XGzQ97x+Xidf3PfCrHvuPOFwQCvI+ZUoGO7yVZFXvMjQ/ICwcM2oqaLfU5jnB8vvTTT9H5126sq7Xs+xmHsl2ARoU7htMFE8KB7XLDkd4OBHM09KvQ8=
On 8/10/06, Yoshie Furuhashi <critical.montages@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
BTW, Cynthia McKinney lost. It doesn't seem a good trade-off to lose
her and get Lamont.
how effective was she in Congress? how effective will Lamont be? until
we know the answers to those questions, we can't tell if it's a good
trade-off or not.
anyway, the point is to improve the trade-off via mass mobilization
against the war & other bad things and for good things (the leftists'
mom & apple pie).
--
Jim Devine / "In science one tries to tell people, in such a way as to
be understood by everyone, something that no one ever knew before. But
in economics, it's the exact opposite." --- Paul Dirac [edited]
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]