Re: anti-GM is bad?

[Leigh Meyers <leighcmeyers@xxxxxxxxx>]

My error, I could have sworn it was US caselaw. However the Canadian
Supreme Court denied Monsanto any monetary gain from Schmeiser, even the
court costs, and further, according to the "defendant":
> ...the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that Monsanto owns and controls
> the gene if they have a patent on it. And that, I think, was a major
> loss for Monsanto, because if you own and control the gene and it gets
> out of control, you have a massive liability issue!

http://www.gmfreeireland.org/interviews/schmeiser.php

Michael Perelman wrote:
> Yes, it was cross pollinated, which was my point, but the case was
> heard in Canada, not the US.