Re: nay nay

To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: nay nay
From: Leigh Meyers <leighcmeyers@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 12:20:59 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=X1Drjt84copwshptkbpNUckH2bycCrDE/rBj8nxsIBBvDVid5EydU4sHV7UdOCOkWmCIn0jVAhTNfHdO2Re/G2HJq8SxMlPt/Nz6sRdyIMyFHjhULpP/4DVZ/Jd7Ju9IAcVeNPfCwcAmiWgkRs32or2Xg0gMQ0SUNZVSBszash4=
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)

Eugene Coyle wrote:

No, I don't agree with Carrol's view on this.

Gene Coyle

Seconded.

I had a much more succinct explanation prepared, but I'm not sending
hatemail today.


Leigh
http://leighm.net/

References:
- Re: nay nay
  - From: Rui Correia
- Re: nay nay
  - From: Carrol Cox
- Re: nay nay
  - From: Michael Perelman
- Re: nay nay
  - From: Eugene Coyle

Thread context:
- Re: nay nay, (continued)
- Swans Release: July 3, 3006, Louis Proyect Mon 03 Jul 2006, 01:39 GMT