Max wrote--
I vaguely remember the quality-price thing. Was there much follow-up to that paper?
Yes and no. It was primarily a survey of the literature on the phenomenon, most of the threads of which kept going. There are some critiques of the general idea of asymmetric information as a basis for non-market-clearing equilibrium, esp. in the context of labor markets, and responses to those critiques. The price/quality idea informed the early 90s mainstream debate on dual labor markets and interindustry wage differentials, with Dickens and Lang, Summers and Katz and others carrying the ball, pretty effectively I thought, for the existence of market segmentation.
And, by the way, contra Max, persistent ("equilibrium") shortages are most definitely not "impossible" in micro. They can arise due to monopsony power or a phenomenon Stiglitz refers to as "the dependence of quality on price." It is typical to have supra-market-clearing equilibrium wages in the latter scenario.
Gil
-- ---------------------------------------- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 12838 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len
- Re: Question about Say's Law, (continued)
- Re: Question about Say's Law, Eugene Coyle Fri 26 May 2006, 14:26 GMT
- Re: Question about Say's Law, Sandwichman Thu 25 May 2006, 22:32 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: Question about Say's Law, Gil Skillman Thu 25 May 2006, 21:45 GMT
- Re: Question about Say's Law, Max B. Sawicky Fri 26 May 2006, 13:56 GMT
- Re: Question about Say's Law, Gil Skillman Fri 26 May 2006, 15:24 GMT
- Price as a Signal of Quality: was Question about Say's Law, michael perelman Fri 26 May 2006, 16:01 GMT
- Re: Price as a Signal of Quality: was Question about Say's Law, Bill Lear Fri 26 May 2006, 16:14 GMT
- Thoughts on Ward Churchill, Louis Proyect Thu 25 May 2006, 20:17 GMT
- Re: Thoughts on Ward Churchill, bitchlab Thu 25 May 2006, 21:07 GMT