PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Sen. McGovern on income distribution
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Sen. McGovern on income distribution
- From: Eugene Coyle <eugenecoyle@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 11:09:04 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=igc.org; b=X+WCAvJFAoJdwBS2ZoWOXjRs7AIqzmcuR0aVPuATCWmfzds1pT3CATLRbkgHisxR; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2
Jim Devine wrote:
wasn't it Gompers who said "more"?
Yes. McGovern isn't perfect!
Is this piece (I'm wondering how much, in one way or another, he got
paid for this) the demarcation of an epoch?
I'm trying to imagine the world that might or will unfold if McGovern's
analysis (for want of a better word) becomes the mainstream of USA
politics. We won't need, so much, "immigration reform" -- it will be
nicer to remain in Oaxaca than to stroll across the desert after
climbing the fence.
How few will the numbers be, collecting the dividend checks?
Gene Coyle
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]