PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: hamburgers & jobs
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: hamburgers & jobs
- From: Jim Devine <jdevine03@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:03:29 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jeyNphqRRb099Da2xL8NV/2acbHDtXhvBPlswp+TKxDrDG7DSS8a5ntDW4/Uh6IW1HcxyrcwYyN7mhDLU6F55Xw7eYzHWOaPdve4uQ2aZgPStlW9rHrUQkh0FTdmvdheXKE6jd2f30CicMzJ+d4EOIg4zq+j3vcBExwwvmrUsDc=
sorry about bringing in the issue of whether TV is good or not.
the seeds are goods, but if they're rented, it's a service. This is
exactly like getting the services of a good (an apartment) by renting
it.
A "pure" service would be one that can't be stock-piled (like a
hair-cut) because it's not tangible. The "good" that's being "rented"
to get a service is labor-power. The service is labor.
On 4/18/06, Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I did not mean that the distinction is moral. Only that it is difficult to separate
> services & goods in many cases. Monsanto "rents" seeds; it does not sell them,
> because they don't want the farmer to own the seeds. Are they supplying a service?
--
Jim Devine / "There can be no real individual freedom in the presence
of economic insecurity." -- Chester Bowles
- Thread context:
- Re: hamburgers & jobs, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]