PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] question re France
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Marxism] question re France
- From: Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:56:53 -0500
- Comments: To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition <marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu>
Andy P. wrote:
Yesterday's strikes and demos are awe-inspiring (and combined with
the actions in Britain, South Africa, and the US in the last week,
very encouraging).
One question: comparing the 1 to 2 million on strike yesterday to
the 10 million at the peak of 1968, what sectors need to be pulled
out next? The union leaderships have very consciously and
explicitly NOT declared a general strike, but that doesn't mean it won't
happen. So the question is, based on sectors that WERE pulled out
yesterday, who's next?
I think the French are determined not to put up with the bullshit that the
U.S. introduced:
NY Times, March 29, 2006
Books of The Times | 'The Disposable American'
How Pink Slips Hurt More Than Workers
By THOMAS GEOGHEGAN
Is the layoff the great American wound? In Louis Uchitelle's account, it
seems a wound in triplicate. It hollows out companies so they can't
compete. It hollows out the country by removing middle-class jobs. It
hollows out the middle-class employees who are laid off and then too often
drop permanently to a demeaning, low-wage way of life. To Mr. Uchitelle,
who reports on economics for The New York Times, corporate America's
addiction to the layoff has gone past the point of economic rationality. In
this fascinating book he tries to tell the history of the United States in
our time as the unchecked rise of layoffs.
"The Disposable American" is a history in which odd characters like Pat
Buchanan, the former chief executives Jack Welch and Albert J. Dunlap
(known as Chainsaw Al), the economist Alfred Kahn and others loom large ?
but so do Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and Robert E. Rubin, former secretary
of the treasury. But Mr. Uchitelle is just as interested in ordinary people
and in the way that layoffs keep tormenting those who have been let go. As
he writes, "I did not think in the early stages of the reporting for this
book that I would be drawn so persistently into the psychiatric aspect of
layoffs."
The layoff, Mr. Uchitelle argues, has transformed the nation. At least 30
million full-time American employees have gotten pink slips since the Labor
Department belatedly started to count them in 1984. But add in the early
retirees, the "quits" who saw the layoffs coming, and the number is much
higher ? a whole ghost nation trekking into what for most will be
lower-wage work. This is the Dust Bowl in our Golden Bowl, and to Mr.
Uchitelle, layoffs in one way are worse than the unemployment of the
1930's. At least then, most of the jobless came back to better-paid, more
secure jobs. Those laid off in our time almost never will.
Mr. Uchitelle effectively wrecks the claim that all this downsizing makes
the country more productive, more competitive, more flexible. He is willing
to admit that downsizing can be necessary. "The global economy is not to be
denied," he writes. But to lay off is now like a business school tic,
whether it makes any sense or not. With fewer employees, many companies
begin to crumble. Innovation also suffers. "Rather than try to outstrip
foreign competitors in innovation, a costly and risky process, we gave up
in product after product," Mr. Uchitelle writes. As he points out, many of
the business stars now are companies, like Southwest Airlines, that have
refused to downsize at all. A growing number of economists argue that
layoffs cause more problems than they solve.
The heart of Mr. Uchitelle's book is his detailed, wide-ranging reporting.
He is present, taking notes, while airline mechanics are being counseled
into job training that will take them into lower-wage work. If they were
not so painful, these moments would have a certain droll comedy. One
mechanic ends up running a water taxi for tourists. Another goes into
maintenance. Others find jobs "throwing boxes" at Federal Express. As one
of the ex-mechanics tells Mr. Uchitelle years later: "It is hard to look in
your son's eyes and explain to him that you are making $12 an hour and know
his high school friends are making that much on the side."
In one of his shrewder moves, Mr. Uchitelle goes right into the enemy camp,
as it were, and looks in on a reunion of Harvard graduates, the class of
'68. But even Harvard grads are among the wounded now ? some have received
pink slips. Mr. Uchitelle makes a strong case that the whole middle class
is at risk. During the Clinton era, the claim was that the United States
was expanding high-wage, high-skilled jobs, and that the laid off could
simply jump into jobs as good or better. But Mr. Uchitelle takes apart this
argument. After all, he writes, as of 2004, more than 45 percent of
American workers were earning $13.25 an hour or less. The jobs that the
country has been "growing" the fastest include those like janitor, hospital
orderly and cashier.
It nettles Mr. Uchitelle that even the center-left politicians have said so
little about this trend ? or have done so little to stop layoffs. In fact,
layoffs rose faster in the first half of the 1990's than they did in the
first half of the 80's. Mr. Uchitelle particularly blames Mr. Clinton. One
of his chapters is titled "A Green Light From Clinton." Mr. Uchitelle
writes: "As much as anyone, he disconnected the Democratic party from its
past, specifically its New Deal concern for job security and full
employment." Indeed, it is Mr. Uchitelle's point that it took government
action to bring about the reign of layoffs.
He is also clear that this began long before the Clinton presidency. Mr.
Uchitelle puts special emphasis on the deregulation of many industries, the
dilution of the Humphrey-Hawkins Full Employment Act of 1978 and what he
regards as other political wrong turns. Still, in a brief concluding
chapter, it is unclear whether Mr. Uchitelle sees any good solutions now ?
including a solution that he attributes to this reviewer.
In this retelling of American history, Mr. Uchitelle is baffled by the
collapse of any serious resistance to these mass layoffs. Even the
protestors who began to sound off in the 90's generally believed that
companies did have to downsize or die. It bothers Mr. Uchitelle that the
mechanics and others he covers in this book and gets to know personally
often blame themselves. "Whenever I insisted that layoffs were a phenomenon
in America beyond their control, they agreed perfunctorily and then went
right back to describing ... why it was somehow their fault or their
particular bad luck."
Many readers know Mr. Uchitelle as a business journalist with an acute
analytic bent. That is in this book, but there is a surprising passion as
well. He urges ? demands ? that Americans speak up: not to give empty
speeches about how more of us should go to college, or "skill up," but to
stop the layoffs from ravaging us all.
Thomas Geoghegan is a labor lawyer and author.
--
www.marxmail.org
- Thread context:
- Robert Frank replies to criticisms,
Jim Devine Wed 29 Mar 2006, 21:16 GMT
- Immigration Bill Protests Day Two: Thousand in the Streets, H.S. Students Arrested In Watsonville Ca.,
Leigh Meyers Wed 29 Mar 2006, 20:12 GMT
- New ways to keep immigrants out of the Netherlands and Germany,
Louis Proyect Wed 29 Mar 2006, 19:14 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] question re France,
Louis Proyect Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:56 GMT
- CGT and UNEF on the Anti-CPE Demo of 3 Million on 28 March 2006,
Yoshie Furuhashi Wed 29 Mar 2006, 16:46 GMT
- China may sign uranium deal with Australia,
Ulhas Joglekar Wed 29 Mar 2006, 15:36 GMT
- a critique,
Gernot Kohler Wed 29 Mar 2006, 14:53 GMT
- REVISED Resolution on immigrants' human rights,
Charles Brown Wed 29 Mar 2006, 14:06 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]