PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Depoliticisisng economics
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Depoliticisisng economics
- From: Autoplectic <autoplectic@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:24:13 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hPou96r1hejSF2Nm3r9fbeJFSvQvjigjRlRAN4EyfvVgQ/c2usiZx2lpBzLEngBY+dDgpk1X1pnGsL5fhyuLx5YCJRqnKODO8o4PoZ5iYLuLNOOpyPq4gKrSwIjrEiga+NNMBBVuwSoE8XWUj53BaHWhbRHrdGTgL1CO0iGuxxg=
On 1/9/06, Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
economists still remain rather liberal and have a wider view of the
> I attended one session on intellectual property. One paper was
> interesting, but the others consisted of abstract models, which were
> barren of any real content. Can you really learn about intellectual
> property, poverty, global warming or anything else that way?
----------------------
Were there any interesting presentations on global warming and
technological change? Or was it all about the virtues of emissions
trading?
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]