PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: econophysics
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: econophysics
- From: Jim Devine <jdevine03@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:35:56 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OwF01evloZn2xR0Zf7/vSkaqeyk49mlqLa2zfIhH56OUAcD3rwzCYzwUuE3YC0p0AGoKIrLi8o+UetHlnbp4Zuv9eO8+/tWkjFdh86fsrxfMMFNgczqtrx0LrHbmhj2SXQTRnHGy2mlxDLj3Ax2NM6iiY2tZCLErGm34c4QTPB4=
Pareto.
I think the econophysics folks think that economics is so bad that
they don't have to study it at all. It's like the leading lights at
MIT economics, who don't study econ. unless it's mathematical.
On 12/12/05, Max Sawicky <sawicky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Didn't Pareto or some dude gin up this notion 100 years ago?
> December 11, 2005/New York TIMES
> Econophysics
> By CHRISTOPHER SHEA
>
> Victor Yakovenko, a physicist at the University of Maryland, happens
> to think that current patterns of economic inequality are as natural,
> and unalterable, as the properties of air molecules in your kitchen.
--
Jim Devine
"Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way and let
people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
- Thread context:
- Re: Source Query was Re: econophysics, (continued)
- Re: econophysics,
Eugene Coyle Mon 12 Dec 2005, 18:07 GMT
- Re: econophysics,
Daniel Davies Mon 12 Dec 2005, 20:51 GMT
- Re: econophysics,
Max Sawicky Mon 12 Dec 2005, 18:33 GMT
- Re: econophysics,
Les Schaffer Mon 12 Dec 2005, 20:00 GMT
- Re: econophysics,
Perelman, Michael Tue 13 Dec 2005, 00:01 GMT
- Re: econophysics,
Julio Huato Tue 13 Dec 2005, 01:01 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]