PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: so what of it, hombres?
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: so what of it, hombres?
- From: Jim Devine <jdevine03@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 09:23:41 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ef5QTi9ODM2fnm/jkNr5E7naTKmpdewVKfi41F+a4si48LEVTxsYRgaun1s9ExP7PwMrncWjDNtKZLW4J46k6DE57Y70Xa+OdNqpzSWYxML2SpThEmL8EXALxEGYA57LZcgITeY5ZTqHdUM3yfBBonRdGK4PZlrhoQJcAZTUMIQ=
Is it possible that someone (Michael Perelman?) could decide which
submissions to pen-l are the most interesting, important, or useful --
and thus should be recorded on the pen-l blog?
On 9/23/05, ravi <listmail@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> my current sense is that perhaps we are not ready for this stuff yet. at
> least not the full site with wiki documents to serve as a wikipedia
> equivalent. but perhaps some may still be interested in the blog?
--
Jim Devine
"Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way and let
people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
- Thread context:
- Re: so what of it, hombres?, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]