Perhaps David Shemano, citing Robert Crandall on bankruptcy, doesn't know that the CEO of Northwest alleged that Crandall phoned-- when he was CEO of American Airlines -- to suggest what sounded to the Northwest guy like a conspiracy. Northwest failed to prevail in the court case. But Crandall knew what he was doing -- the industry needs cooperation to control the level of supply.
And it isn't just bankruptcy. The Alaska Airlines MD 80 that went into the Pacific off California a couple of years ago reflected the pressure on the maintenance from the structure of the industry. It also reflected the pressure on the pilots who died because they didn't resist that pressure. They flew past airports because they were pressured to nurse the ship home.
Gene Coyle
Charles Brown wrote:
David Shemano
It seems to me that the airlines were a coddled oligopoly for 50 years and the unions (and shareholders) were able to share in the benefits of the oligopoly at the expense of the flying public. Deregulation changed all of that and, like the Hebrews who had to wander in the desert for 40 years to work off the slave mentality, it is taking a generation for management and the unions to adjust.
^^^ CB: On this analogy, the airline management and unions were like slaves to whom in the past before deregulation ?
If they were an oligopoly , weren't they more like masters than slaves ? So, they had to work off the master mentality and think more like slaves , maybe ?
Slaves to whom ? Wallstreet , so to speak. J.P. Morgan and Associates.
^^^^^
I do agree with Robert Crandall that the ability of carriers to operate in chapter 11 does have a prejudical effect on the other carriers. I am not sure of the solution to that problem. There are specific provisions in the Bankruptcy Code that give aircraft lessors and secured lenders special rights -- they can take back their aircraft unless the airline cures any defaults and agrees to perform all obligations within 60 days after the bankruptcy is filed. However, like the old joke that if you owe the bank $5 million you are in trouble, but if you owe the bank $500 million the bank is in trouble, lessors and lenders are reluctant to take back their equipment and would rather work out a deal.
^^^^^^ CB: Do you know where I can get in trouble with a $5 million loan ?
- Re: Neoclassical bizarreness!!!, (continued)
- Re: Neoclassical bizarreness!!!, Marvin Gandall Wed 21 Sep 2005, 13:20 GMT
- Re: Neoclassical bizarreness!!!, Carl Remick Wed 21 Sep 2005, 13:24 GMT
- Re: Neoclassical bizarreness!!!, Michael Perelman Wed 21 Sep 2005, 13:30 GMT
- Neoclassical bizarreness!!!, Charles Brown Wed 21 Sep 2005, 14:03 GMT
- Re: Neoclassical bizarreness!!!, Eugene Coyle Wed 21 Sep 2005, 14:17 GMT
- Re: Neoclassical bizarreness!!!, David B. Shemano Wed 21 Sep 2005, 19:30 GMT
- Re: Neoclassical bizarreness!!!, Carl Remick Wed 21 Sep 2005, 19:48 GMT
- Re: Bankruptcy and employee rights (Was Neoclassical bizarreness!!!), Marvin Gandall Wed 21 Sep 2005, 23:51 GMT
- Re: Neoclassical bizarreness!!!, David B. Shemano Wed 21 Sep 2005, 20:09 GMT