PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [OT] free Cindy Sheehan!
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [OT] free Cindy Sheehan!
- From: tom walker <lumpoflabour@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:47:38 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=jcWMdeJVtvW1wp7EIfF4ZumZHsE8Zwuv5PcAfkgRnDUmQz8GgxOlkTjUSJ0w1gjMNP59ajESr6RML6N1LvfkTO+Z84QMyJa8XrBYJvukY4wnKC/cUsHpsx9aCxsLI9Flw4FvMu8h93g/6a2mIk108Fw9wK2vhFUEzwKm/8Btleo= ;
I first heard "the enemy of my enemy" described as a
traditional south asian political truism that
explained why it was possible for the English to
colonize India -- England was every other local
ruler's "friend".
Sandwichman
--- Carrol Cox <cbcox@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jim Devine wrote:
> >
> >
> > this is proof, once again, that Chairman Mao's
> dictum that "the enemy
> > of my enemy is my friend" is total and utter BS.
>
> I don't remember Mao saying exactly that. I do
> remember something like
> it, though I can't remember the exact wording, and
> when I read it I both
> disagreed and _also_ saw, in the context in which he
> said it, that it
> made some sense. Something like it was, of course,
> the foundation of the
> United Front Against the Japanese invacion. And it
> is easy to make up
> hypothetical (but reasonable) situations in which it
> holds. If a
> purse-snatcher scares off a would-be rapist, for
> example. I would say
> the dictum (as you phrase it) is neither right nor
> wrong in the
> abstract. Its whole meaning depends on context.
>
> Carrol
>
__________________________________________________________
Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca
- Thread context:
- Re: [OT] free Cindy Sheehan!, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]