PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
query
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: query
- From: Jim Devine <jdevine03@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:44:50 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Ew8ha2CuzEf+44YDqWqL4b5KWeR9YSKWpEZl8PK82aRD5lhKT7xlXFiahz6xNWQis1Mi3SHSTfNADfBxD50u8LE1HkRSfJKmGxAWhiM6/lGP/CGnVUV7GEIYxDcwT1DeOD72LFMgDWZijDE4GFYZo3Q+0qkvqASry1ioui8cVuU=
all sorts of things typically rise with GDP, including business
optimism, profitability, cash flow, the ratio of business income to
debt, the ratio of sales to industrial capacity, and the degree of
uncertainty. All else constant, the combination of these rises
encourages fixed business investment to rise. What should I call this
connection?
Currently, in the textbook I'm helping to write, I call this the
"prosperity effect" on fixed investment. Is there a better name that
anyone can think of? (I used to call it the "accelerator effect," but
that gets confused with the accelerator theory.)
--
Jim Devine
"living a life of quiet desperation -- but always with style!"
- Thread context:
- Re: deep thoughts, (continued)
- query,
Jim Devine Tue 23 Aug 2005, 21:44 GMT
- Re: query,
tom walker Tue 23 Aug 2005, 22:09 GMT
- Re: query,
Jim Devine Tue 23 Aug 2005, 22:10 GMT
- Re: query,
tom walker Tue 23 Aug 2005, 22:16 GMT
- Re: query,
michael a. lebowitz Tue 23 Aug 2005, 22:38 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]