PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: oil refining conspiracy?
Shell actually refused to sell a refinery that they wanted to shut
down. Of course they like tight capacity, but Daniel's point was that
the linkage to petroleum prices is weak. He is probably correct,
although a refinery shortage could give heart to some speculators who
follow the greater fool theory.
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 06:10:15PM -0400, Doug Henwood wrote:
> Michael Perelman wrote:
>
> >You are correct, but in Kaliforneeya refinery capacity is short & the
> >out of state delivery channels relatively narrow. Spiking gasoline
> >prices here would have more shock value than crude oil. Only our
> >culture and politics are crude. Our petroleum is refined.
>
> Michael, your style has gotten so whimsical!
>
> Refiners love to keep capacity tight - refineries are expensive, and
> one goes down, retail prices spike. The oil historian/political
> scientist Greg Nowell has written on this somewhere.
>
> Doug
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
- Thread context:
- Re: oil refining conspiracy?, (continued)
- regarding Shleifer,
Michael Perelman Tue 09 Aug 2005, 02:25 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]