PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: oil refining conspiracy?
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: oil refining conspiracy?
- From: Jim Devine <jdevine03@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 08:50:49 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ca6MDZ9/cTqOjYCWdHn8ixisC9a/P7MaVLTWo94N9ZhZIPXyuOO+ghGIFp/UBmFtKueGAXgxA3iH/nbejCx0o3Hu4VNP8vPauEm4sjVRzHggbwUGaPUpQx+c71os1p2ctWFy+ZK6jiDtA7XsYZMu1eoMt3RBSHuo/uYo/NQYHqk=
OTOH, maybe stress on supply causes accidents?
the CA electricity "deregulation" seemed to deliberately create the
incentive to manipulate supply a la Enron. Is the current oil market
that way?
On 8/9/05, michael perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This sounds like the California electricity scam? Could it be true?
>
> Speculating without facts:
>
> More Outages Hit U.S. Refineries
>
> Recent Incidents Heighten
> Concerns About Capacity;
> Oil Nears $64 a Barrel
>
> Fresh upsets at U.S. refineries over the weekend extended an unusual
> spate of outages that has raised concerns about fuel supplies and
> contributed to a rise in oil prices on the New York futures market to
> nearly $64 a barrel.
>
> The rash of incidents over the past three weeks involves major
> processing units and four fires at a time when refiners are trying to
> run flat out to meet demand. The outages have put added stress on
> already-constrained U.S. fuel-production capacity.
--
Jim Devine
"Economics is extremely useful as a form of employment for
economists." -- John Kenneth Galbraith
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]