Jim Devine wrote:
It's interesting how people wrote back then. There's hardly any math. It's more of an essay.
My favorite anecdote about that is that the production staff of the AER had trouble typesetting the math in the Modigliani/Miller article on capital structure - they'd never seen anything quite like it before.
Doug
- Re: Daniel's interest rate predictor, (continued)
- Re: Daniel's interest rate predictor, Michael Perelman Fri 17 Jun 2005, 21:43 GMT
- Lump of Labor fallacy; May Day, Charles Brown Thu 16 Jun 2005, 22:01 GMT
- Re: Lump of Labor fallacy; May Day, tom walker Fri 17 Jun 2005, 00:46 GMT
- Boulding in defense of monopoly, Jim Devine Thu 16 Jun 2005, 21:52 GMT
- Re: Boulding in defense of monopoly, Doug Henwood Thu 16 Jun 2005, 22:02 GMT
- Re: Boulding in defense of monopoly, Michael Perelman Thu 16 Jun 2005, 22:16 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: Boulding in defense of monopoly, Jim Devine Thu 16 Jun 2005, 22:05 GMT
- Re: Boulding in defense of monopoly, michael perelman Fri 17 Jun 2005, 03:10 GMT
- Re: Boulding in defense of monopoly, Robert Scott Gassler Fri 17 Jun 2005, 12:13 GMT