Re: Ruling Could Transform Canada's Health System

[Hari Kumar <hari.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Could this simply be extended to: No social welfare net can operate effectively under capitalist relations?

An interesting side-issue that has had a lot of play in this discussion, is a pointed comparison being made to health care delivery in France & Germany. As I understand it, both have access to private care, while also having a good state service. The argument is made that this has not undermined the health care services or the
health outcomes.
I am very familiar with the British health care system, but not quite so with these. I wil be trying to find out a bit more on this comparison.
In the meantime, the door is WIDE OPEN to for-profit-medicine. Though to be quite clear, for-profit medicine HAS been running (even in Ontario) for a bit of time now.
Hari Kumar
____________________________
> This is a very interesting illustration of how individualistic market
> relations cannot easily coexist with socialized relationships.  May a
> Gresham's law of relationships.
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 07:17:23AM -0400, Michael Hoover wrote:
> > Associated Presss
> > Ruling Could Transform Canada's Health System
> > 09 June, 2005  19:18 GMT
> >
> > Canada's Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a Quebec law that banned private insurance for services covered under Medicare, a landmark decision that could affect the country's universal health-care system.
> >
> > The justices took a year to rule on a case that began in 1997, when George Zeliotis, an elderly Montreal man, tried to pay for hip replacement surgery rather than wait nearly a year for treatment at a public hospital.
> >
> > Zeliotis told the high court that he suffered pain and became addicted to painkillers during the yearlong wait for surgery, and he should have been allowed to pay for faster service with private insurance.
> >
> > "It is indeed a historical ruling that could substantially change the very foundations of Medicare as we know it," said Dr. Albert J. Schumacher, president of the Canadian Medical Association.
> >
> > Mostly Free Health Care
> >
> > Although the ruling was made on the Quebec law, it likely will affect other Canadian provinces that forbid residents from buying private health care insurance for treatment under the country's Medicare system.
> >
> > Opponents of changes to Medicare claimed it could force Canada into a two-tiered health care system in which those who have deeper pockets get faster, better service from doctors who opt out of the public health-care program.
> >
> > Zeliotis' doctor, Jacques Chaoulli, argued that his patient's constitutional rights were violated because Quebec could not provide the care he needed and did not offer him the option of getting it privately.
> >
> > Chaoulli also argued that doctors should be allowed to open private hospitals if patients are willing to pay.
> >
> > The 1984 Canada Health Act affirmed the federal government's commitment to provide mostly free health care to all, including the more than 200,000 immigrants arriving each year, under a system called Medicare.
> >
> > But the universal health-care system -- while considered one of the fairest in the world -- has been plagued by long waiting lists and a lack of doctors, nurses and new equipment. Some patients wait years for surgery, MRI machines are scarce and many Canadians travel to the United States for medical treatment.
> >
> > Marker of Egalitarianism
> >
> > In most Canadian provinces, it is illegal to seek faster treatment and jump to the head of the line by paying out of pocket for public care. Private health clinics have sprouted up even though they are technically illegal, though the provincial governments tend to look the other way.
> >
> > If Zeliotis had been from outside Canada, he could have bought treatment in a private Quebec clinic. That is one way the system discourages the spread of private medicine -- by limiting it to nonresidents.
> >
> > Most polls indicate Canadians support Medicare, despite the high taxes needed to fund the service, seeing it as a marker of egalitarianism and independent identity that sets their country apart from the United States, where some 45 million Americans lack health insurance.
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > Please Note:
> > Due to Florida's very broad public records law, most written communications to or from College employees regarding College business are public records, available to the public and media upon request. Therefore, this e-mail communication may be subject to public disclosure.
>
> --
> Michael Perelman
> Economics Department
> California State University
> Chico, CA 95929
>
> Tel. 530-898-5321
> E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
>