|
Well, let's close "economics" departments. Tom Walker says, from a
different perspective, that criticizing "economics" makes one a crank.
Where in the USA is it permitted to teach "political economy"? I
recall a flap of some months ago where the "economists" united in an
attempt to shut down the Notre Dame department == big names signing a
letter to the effect that Notre Dame students wouldn'tr be admitted to
"good" grad departments. Perelman has remarked that he doubts if he
could get a job these days -- don't recall the range of his
possibilities. It is past time to contend that there is a possibility to "do good economics." Gene Coyle Jim Devine wrote:
|
- Re: non-tuism [was: sociology of economic knowledge], (continued)
- Re: non-tuism [was: sociology of economic knowledge], Carrol Cox Fri 10 Jun 2005, 14:41 GMT
- Re: sociology of economic knowledge, Michael Perelman Thu 09 Jun 2005, 23:03 GMT
- Re: sociology of economic knowledge, Eugene Coyle Fri 10 Jun 2005, 20:01 GMT
- Re: sociology of economic knowledge, Jim Devine Fri 10 Jun 2005, 20:09 GMT
- Re: sociology of economic knowledge, Eugene Coyle Fri 10 Jun 2005, 20:35 GMT
- Re: sociology of economic knowledge, Jim Devine Fri 10 Jun 2005, 20:42 GMT
- Re: sociology of economic knowledge, Perelman, Michael Fri 10 Jun 2005, 21:33 GMT
- Re: sociology of economic knowledge, Jim Devine Fri 10 Jun 2005, 21:37 GMT
- Re: sociology of economic knowledge, Michael Perelman Fri 10 Jun 2005, 21:50 GMT