Re: sociology of economic knowledge

To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: sociology of economic knowledge
From: Carrol Cox <cbcox@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:04:43 -0500

tom walker wrote:
>
> One of the core principles of mainstream
> economics is 'non-tuism'

Is this a pun of some kind I fail to get or is it a typo?

Carrol

Follow-Ups:
- Re: sociology of economic knowledge
  - From: tom walker

References:
- Re: sociology of economic knowledge
  - From: tom walker

Prev by Date: New Bush housing plan means more cuts for the poor
Next by Date: Re: Bukowski: Born Into This
Previous by thread: Re: sociology of economic knowledge
Next by thread: Re: sociology of economic knowledge
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- draft research paper available, Jim Devine Thu 09 Jun 2005, 17:49 GMT
- Bleach Blanket class struggle, Jim Devine Thu 09 Jun 2005, 17:49 GMT
- sociology of economic knowledge, Jim Devine Thu 09 Jun 2005, 17:49 GMT
  - Re: sociology of economic knowledge, tom walker Thu 09 Jun 2005, 18:22 GMT
    - Re: sociology of economic knowledge, Carrol Cox Thu 09 Jun 2005, 20:04 GMT
      
      Re: sociology of economic knowledge, tom walker Thu 09 Jun 2005, 21:09 GMT
      
      non-tuism [was: sociology of economic knowledge], Jim Devine Thu 09 Jun 2005, 21:20 GMT
      
      Re: non-tuism [was: sociology of economic knowledge], Robert Scott Gassler Fri 10 Jun 2005, 09:52 GMT
      
      Re: non-tuism [was: sociology of economic knowledge], Carrol Cox Fri 10 Jun 2005, 14:41 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]