PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: query: real wage catch-up
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: query: real wage catch-up
- From: Jim Devine <jdevine03@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:37:19 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ly/n55L/qfEJfk8MFbDLTlH6q+9jKAUqJXepdrweY9S2D+CWFhjVbYyBlqOz7ddV+7HjxG7YlrCdH8IIxdRVgHsZmHRo1wNDBlLkQp+X7ha8Q/pnXL9vaH6GEzTzRqEyxYMwN95Z41JNLO2oLfmpy4dGiKOM+0VG1877dl+dl8Q=
I'd say so. As part of a research paper, I have this simple regression
showing the rise in the ratio of property income to wage income in the
US since 1970. On Monday, I added three new quarters of data to the
regression against time. The time coefficient stayed the same (2.2E-04
per quarter), but it became more significant (the t-stat went from 6.2
to 6.5 with 141 observations for the latter). And with only three more
quarters!
I don't have time to figure out whether that's significantly more
significant, but it struck me as dramatic.
On 6/7/05, paul phillips <phillipsp@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Doug had a very persuasive graph on his LBO website that showed a dramatic
> disconnect between wages and productivity. Is that trend continuing?
>
> Paul Phillips
--
Jim Devine
"Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way
and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]