PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
People vs Banks
Isn't the rule that
mortgage payments are high proportion paid to interest and low proportion paid
to principle in early payments an arbitrary exercise of banking power ? If
higher proportions of early payments were used to pay off the principle, the
principle would be paid off sooner and the total amount of interest paid over
the whole mortgage would be less than under the current rule.
We need a law that
the proportions of each mortgage payment attributed to principle and interest
should be the same as the proportions of the interest rate to the
principle.
If the Interest rate
on a mortgage is 7%, then each mortgage payment should be divided up 7
parts to interest to 100 parts to principle.
Charles
- Thread context:
- I don't know German but...,
Devine, James Mon 14 Mar 2005, 20:19 GMT
- Decline of the dollar,
Louis Proyect Mon 14 Mar 2005, 19:19 GMT
- Fwd from Jim Craven: On Dan Rather,
Louis Proyect Mon 14 Mar 2005, 19:09 GMT
- People vs Banks,
Charles Brown Mon 14 Mar 2005, 18:49 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- People vs Banks,
Charles Brown Tue 15 Mar 2005, 21:57 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]