PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: article on oil & dollars
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: article on oil & dollars
- From: "Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:29:21 -0800
- Thread-index: AcUdTM4vFooAX6fUTnKIjE9p6z7UTAAAUUEp
- Thread-topic: [PEN-L] article on oil & dollars
Dean Baker argues that US productivity growth has been exaggerated, since depreciation also sped up. If you adjust for the latter, US productivity growth doesn't look as good. Of course, productivity is really hard to pin down, as Michael Perelman says.
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx http://myweb.lmu.edu/jdevine
________________________________
From: PEN-L list on behalf of Doug Henwood
Sent: Sun 2/27/2005 8:20 PM
To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] article on oil & dollars
Julio Huato wrote:
>I would think that the true determinants of economic power are (1)
>social institutions that constantly drive productivity growth, (2)
>pre-existing productivity levels, and (3) resources. That's what the
>entire history of capitalism suggests. No?
According to the official stats, US productivity accelerated after
1995 and the rest of the rich world's didn't. Odd how that happened
as the US international balance deteriorated so radically.
Doug
- Thread context:
- Re: article on oil & dollars, (continued)
- Re: article on oil & dollars,
Julio Huato Mon 28 Feb 2005, 14:47 GMT
- Re: article on oil & dollars,
Doug Henwood Mon 28 Feb 2005, 04:20 GMT
- Re: article on oil & dollars,
Devine, James Mon 28 Feb 2005, 04:31 GMT
- Re: article on oil & dollars,
Devine, James Mon 28 Feb 2005, 14:38 GMT
- Re: article on oil & dollars,
Julio Huato Mon 28 Feb 2005, 14:45 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]