PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Stars and Stripes: "The whole city, from every side, was fighting"
At 10:26 AM -0500 12/31/04, Doug Henwood wrote:
if a majority of Iraqis didn't want immediate withdrawal
It's only the polls sponsored by firms from the occupying nations
that said that "a majority of Iraqis didn't want immediate
withdrawal," and even those polls didn't say that Iraqis would want
to have their nation occupied longer than one or two years. The Iraq
War will see its second anniversary on March 20, 2005.
In any case, the most important point is that, with the possible
exception of the Kurdish militia, few Iraqis are committed to
fighting for the continuing foreign occupation of Iraq.
At 4:06 PM +0000 12/31/04, Daniel Davies wrote:
I doubt that the Viet Cong could have won an election in Southern
Vietnam, but there were just about enough of them to make the US
occupation unsustainable in the long term.
Politically, Vietnam and Iraq are not comparable (at least not yet).
"It was generally conceded that had an election been held, Ho Chi
Minh would have been elected Premier." -- Dwight D. Eisenhower,
Mandate for Change, 1953-1956,
<http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/vietnam/55election.htm>
--
Yoshie
* Critical Montages: <http://montages.blogspot.com/>
* "Proud of Britain": <http://www.proudofbritain.net/ > and
<http://www.proud-of-britain.org.uk/>
- Thread context:
- Re: Jared Diamond, (continued)
- Electoral cretinism,
Louis Proyect Sat 01 Jan 2005, 15:39 GMT
- Universal interventionism,
Chris Burford Sat 01 Jan 2005, 12:36 GMT
- Re: Stars and Stripes: "The whole city, from every side, was fighting",
Yoshie Furuhashi Sat 01 Jan 2005, 09:20 GMT
- The ambassador,
michael perelman Sat 01 Jan 2005, 01:33 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]