Daniel Davies wrote:
The idea is that the USA is indulging in financial intermediation on a grand scale; it borrows capital from Asia, invests it across the world, and picks up the spread between the borrowing rate and the rate of return on investments as a profit.
Except that in the latest BoP release, our balance on investment income has gone close to 0 - $2.6b in 04Q2, down from $12.2b in 04Q1. You can have a positive rate of return spread, but if the stocks keep going against you, you'll end up in the hole anyway.
Doug
- US Campaign| Defend Academic Freedom, Yoshie Furuhashi Tue 21 Sep 2004, 15:35 GMT
- Peter Garber, trade deficits, & bubbles, michael perelman Tue 21 Sep 2004, 02:45 GMT
- Re: Peter Garber, trade deficits, & bubbles, Eugene Coyle Tue 21 Sep 2004, 16:35 GMT
- Re: Peter Garber, trade deficits, & bubbles, Daniel Davies Tue 21 Sep 2004, 20:24 GMT
- Re: Peter Garber, trade deficits, & bubbles, Doug Henwood Tue 21 Sep 2004, 20:40 GMT
- Re: Peter Garber, trade deficits, & bubbles, Daniel Davies Tue 21 Sep 2004, 21:01 GMT
- Re: Peter Garber, trade deficits, & bubbles, Doug Henwood Tue 21 Sep 2004, 21:05 GMT
- Re: Peter Garber, trade deficits, & bubbles, Michael Perelman Tue 21 Sep 2004, 21:29 GMT
- Re: Peter Garber, trade deficits, & bubbles, Michael Perelman Tue 21 Sep 2004, 20:40 GMT