I wrote:
another element (for the US, the capitalist
world hegemon) was the rise of the large peace-time military, the "warfare
state," so that his "modern mixed economy was (Jim O'Connor's) "warfare-welfare
state."
Where did James O'Connor first use this _expression_
"warfare-welfare state" ? Was it in his book Fiscal Crisis of the State
?
Jurriaan: >As far as I remember, at the end
of world war 2 Paul Samuelson thought that capitalism was doomed, whereas around
1970 he said that the problem of cyclical economic fluctuations had now been
solved.<
No, I doubt that it happened that way. It's possible that he
believed -- as a student of Alvin Hansen (a secular stagnation theorist) -- that
a recession was quite likely after WW2. But that's different from capitalism
being "doomed." In fact, about that time, he proposed the "neoclassical
synthesis," in which Keynesian policies would maintain full employment, so that
neoclassical scarcity-driven theories would apply. Then, as the post-war long
boom progressed, he became more and more confident. I believe he was one of
those who declared the business cycle "dead" in the late 1960s or early 1970s.
Jim Devine
- Re: Samuelson = heretic ?, (continued)
- Re: Samuelson = heretic ?, Devine, James Thu 16 Sep 2004, 19:54 GMT
- Samuelson = heretic ?, Charles Brown Fri 17 Sep 2004, 14:18 GMT
- Re: Samuelson = heretic ?, Devine, James Fri 17 Sep 2004, 15:30 GMT
- Re: Samuelson = heretic ?, Jurriaan Bendien Fri 17 Sep 2004, 16:08 GMT
- Re: Samuelson = heretic ?, Devine, James Fri 17 Sep 2004, 20:00 GMT
- super-profits belatedly, Charles Brown Thu 16 Sep 2004, 13:55 GMT
- Re: super-profits belatedly, Jurriaan Bendien Thu 16 Sep 2004, 15:20 GMT
- The Olympics and the Greek Economy, ken hanly Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:25 GMT
- Keeping priorities straight in Iraq, ken hanly Thu 16 Sep 2004, 02:27 GMT