Devine, James wrote:
right. But there's not simple continuity between the "liberal stage" of capitalism during the 19th century (under British hegemony) and the "neoliberal stage" of the current era (under the US thumb). There was a big retreat from globalization during the late 19th century until the early 1930s. (This serious period of "interimperialist rivalry" leading to war and depression, as Bukharin suggested.) There was also the Cold War period, which set the stage for the neoliberal era, but also involved a lot of social democracy and the like.
Well, yeah. But during the "Golden Age," 1950-70, say, the CPI rose an average of 2.9% a year in the U.S. In the neoliberal 1990s it rose an average of...2.9% a year. And your average crisis theorist is happy to tell you that profitability was higher in the first period than the second. So, where are those superprofits?
Doug
- Re: Michael Perelman speaks in Sacramento on Sept. 16., (continued)
- Re: Michael Perelman speaks in Sacramento on Sept. 16., Michael Perelman Wed 15 Sep 2004, 02:19 GMT
- hanging death: swing state, Dan Scanlan Wed 15 Sep 2004, 01:00 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: hanging death: swing state, Doyle Saylor Wed 15 Sep 2004, 12:36 GMT
- Re: super-profits, Devine, James Tue 14 Sep 2004, 22:48 GMT
- Re: super-profits, Doug Henwood Tue 14 Sep 2004, 23:22 GMT
- Re: super-profits, Yoshie Furuhashi Wed 15 Sep 2004, 13:14 GMT
- Re: super-profits, Jurriaan Bendien Wed 15 Sep 2004, 14:27 GMT
- Re: super-profits, Doug Henwood Wed 15 Sep 2004, 16:56 GMT
- Re: super-profits belatedly, Jurriaan Bendien Thu 16 Sep 2004, 05:20 GMT