PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: a decent analysis, I'd say
I don't think a vote for Nader is a call for, or
depends on, being for Revolution Now. I expressly
stated that voting for Nader is an alternative to such
a view. I did it last time around, and although I
think is an error this time around, I don't demonize
people do who. I think that reasonable disagreement on
this issue is possible. I also think it's a tired
topic. Everyone has said his piece on the topic.
I probably am somewhat testy, or was when I wrote
that. Things are better now.
--- Carrol Cox <cbcox@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Devine, James" wrote:
> >
> > would the people on pen-l who call for "revolution
> NOW' please identify themselves? (You can do it
> off-list if you don't want AGfuhrer Ashcroft to
> know.) I don't think that there are any.
> >
> > It's fallacious to contrast "Revolution NOW" to
> "vote for Kerry." aren't there other alternatives?
> >
> > Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx
> http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
>
> This is the first time I remember Justin pulling
> this silly stunt. I
> expect Doug to ignore the actual question in order
> to sneer at some
> mythical position that no one holds. But Justin
> usually argues positions
> as expressed. He must be as Testy these days as
> Chris Doss.
>
> Carrol
>
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: PEN-L list on behalf of Doug Henwood
> > Sent: Sun 9/5/2004 9:14 AM
> > To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [PEN-L] a decent analysis, I'd say
> >
> > andie nachgeborenen wrote:
> >
> > >Well, Doug and I must be sub-minimal. We also
> don't
> > >think it is advisable to call for Revolution NOW
> as
> > >the answer to all questions. Or at least I don't,
> I
> > >won't speak for Doug. (Not without a substantial
> > >retainer . . . . )
> >
> > You did fine for free. I don't know if "we" are
> even organizationally
> > prepared to call for radical reform now. That's
> one of many reasons
> > that Ralph is polling at 3%.
> >
> > Doug
>
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
- Thread context:
- Re: Kissinger, Bilderberg, and 1973 oil shock, (continued)
- Re: a decent analysis, I'd say,
Carrol Cox Mon 13 Sep 2004, 22:33 GMT
- FW: Video: Hijacking Catastrophe :,
Craven, Jim Mon 13 Sep 2004, 21:48 GMT
- comments on Blackburn's pension scheme,
Doug Henwood Mon 13 Sep 2004, 21:39 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]