Re: a decent analysis, I'd say

[Carrol Cox <cbcox@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Devine, James" wrote:
>
> would the people on pen-l who call for "revolution NOW' please identify themselves? (You can do it off-list if you don't want AGfuhrer Ashcroft to know.) I don't think that there are any.
>
> It's fallacious to contrast "Revolution NOW" to "vote for Kerry." aren't there other alternatives?
>
> Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine

This is the first time I remember Justin pulling this silly stunt. I
expect Doug to ignore the actual question in order to sneer at some
mythical position that no one holds. But Justin usually argues positions
as expressed. He must be as Testy these days as Chris Doss.

Carrol

> ________________________________
>
> From: PEN-L list on behalf of Doug Henwood
> Sent: Sun 9/5/2004 9:14 AM
> To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PEN-L] a decent analysis, I'd say
>
> andie nachgeborenen wrote:
>
> >Well, Doug and I must be sub-minimal. We also don't
> >think it is advisable to call for Revolution NOW as
> >the answer to all questions. Or at least I don't, I
> >won't speak for Doug. (Not without a substantial
> >retainer . . . . )
>
> You did fine for free. I don't know if "we" are even organizationally
> prepared to call for radical reform now. That's one of many reasons
> that Ralph is polling at 3%.
>
> Doug