Space cowboys
John O'Farrell
Friday September 10,
2004
The Guardian [UK]
On Wednesday, Nasa scientists watched in shock
as their Genesis solar project ended in disaster. "I can't believe it" they all
said. "A space mission that went wrong? This is completely unprecedented. I
mean, the last time a major space project ended in embarrassing failure was way,
way back in January when our Mars rover broke down, and then before that the
Beagle 2 project lost contact with its probe, oh and then there was last year's
Columbia disaster, oh and the Hubble Telescope fiasco, but apart from that our
record is very impressive." From now on Nasa is going to launch its rockets on
the 4th of July, just so that everyone thinks they're meant to
explode.
We had been promised a dramatic re-entry for the Genesis capsule, which
was set to return its precious payload of atomic solar particles after a
three-year mission. Stunt pilots hired from Hollywood for the occasion were on
standby waiting to hook up with the capsule as it entered the Earth's
atmosphere, but they failed to connect because they couldn't see out of their
Jedi helmets. "Sorry, can we go for another take on that one?" "Er - no,
actually."
After the parachutes failed to open the capsule crashed to earth and the
scientists found their precious parcel smashed open and the contents scattered
all over the ground; it couldn't have been worse if they had paid the extra for
Royal Mail registered post. The whole point of this trip was to bring back pure
uncontaminated atoms from the sun. Now they're going to have to gather up
everything they find on that patch of ground in Utah and painstakingly analyse
all of it. "It's amazing; solar explosions seem to be emitting old burger
cartons, cigarette butts and Wal-Mart shopping bags."
The team did their
best to remain positive: "There are a lot of things that had to happen in series
and we got just about all of them done and we just did not get the last two or
three done," said Genesis project manager Don Sweetnam. Oh well, that's all
right then. Maybe I'm being a little picky, but if I was plummeting to the
ground at 200mph, and one of those last details included the failure of my
parachute to open, I'd struggle to be upbeat about all the other things that had
gone so well.
How do they get the insurance for all these missions? Perhaps they just have
to hope they get a particularly dim telesales rep when they ring the insurance
company. "So, are there any additional drivers you would like listed on the
policy?"
"Well there are no actual 'drivers' as such, it's a remote-control space
explorer capsule costing $250m."
"Right, no additional drivers and will you be using it for business or
leisure?"
"Well, mainly for catching atoms ejected in solar explosions."
"I'll click 'leisure' then, and can I have the postcode where the vehicle
will be kept, please?"
"Well, for the next two years it will be in orbit at temperatures of
thousands of degrees, trying to dodge solar explosions, meteorites and
collisions with the planet Mercury."
"That's all right, sir, as long as it's not going to be parked in Hackney or
Liverpool."
The so-called Genesis project received its massive funding before they
realised that it had nothing to do with taking Phil Collins into deep space. In
fact, the naming of the craft is not without an irony of its own, since the
purpose of this trip was to inform us about the origins of our solar system. Yet
the president who is paying for it all has passed an education bill allowing
creationism to creep back into American schools. Why does he need to spend
millions on the space probe, to find out what he says Americans can read in the
Book of Genesis? Could it be that he's only claiming to take the Bible at face
value in order to secure votes in America's bible belt? Or maybe they just told
him that with all that fire coming off the sun there must be some oil in there
somewhere?
With the tide of Christian fundamentalism that is increasingly directing
scientific funding in America, soon Nasa won't be able to send out any more
probes unless they are looking for a big bloke with a white beard sitting on a
cloud surrounded by angels. But though their latest mission has ended in
disaster, maybe this week Nasa just settled the science versus religion debate
for once and for all. A huge lump of metal comes flying out of the sky at
200mph, crash lands in the United States, but it completely misses President
George W Bush. Clearly there is no God; what more proof does anyone
need?
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx &
http://myweb.lmu.edu/jdevine
- Re: David Broder's new (materialist) idea, (continued)
- Re: David Broder's new (materialist) idea, Devine, James Sat 11 Sep 2004, 15:36 GMT
- Re: David Broder's new (materialist) idea, michael a. lebowitz Sun 12 Sep 2004, 02:05 GMT
- debates, Dan Scanlan Fri 10 Sep 2004, 23:55 GMT
- while Kerry sleeps...., Dan Scanlan Fri 10 Sep 2004, 23:46 GMT
- lost in space..., Devine, James Fri 10 Sep 2004, 22:25 GMT
- Likud or not..., Devine, James Fri 10 Sep 2004, 22:21 GMT
- Re: Likud or not..., Chris Doss Sat 11 Sep 2004, 11:45 GMT
- Re: Likud or not..., Louis Proyect Sat 11 Sep 2004, 13:22 GMT
- Dzerzhinsky gets a spanky new statue!, Chris Doss Sat 11 Sep 2004, 13:26 GMT