PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Professionalization and staffing at KPFA
Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
I doubt that "professionalization" improves the substantial quality
of radio products. Much of commercial programs produced by
"professionals" are as crappy and kooky as the crappiest and kookiest
of Pacifica and other non-profit radio and public access cable fare,
except that they are slicker and come with higher "production value."
"Professionalization" to me means that broadcasters should know what
they're talking about, speak with reasonable fluency, not make
repeated gaffes on the air (long silences, serious mispronunciations,
bad grammar), and have reasonably appealing or intriguing voices that
people will want to listen to. If that's elitist, I plead guilty.
Doug
- Thread context:
- lesser evil?,
Dan Scanlan Sun 22 Aug 2004, 02:37 GMT
- venezuela's electronic voting,
michael a. lebowitz Sun 22 Aug 2004, 00:46 GMT
- Professionalization and staffing at KPFA,
Doyle Saylor Sat 21 Aug 2004, 22:05 GMT
- egg,
Dan Scanlan Sat 21 Aug 2004, 21:27 GMT
- apocryphal soviet screw factory,
Michael Perelman Sat 21 Aug 2004, 20:54 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]