Whether you think invasion/occupation versus sanctions/subversion represents only a nuance of difference or is more significant than that is a matter of judgment, of course. Certainly, you can make a case that the sanctions cost many lives -- perhaps as many or more than the invasion and subsequent occupation. But I think, if forced to choose, the Iraqis would still have preferred to continue contesting and evading the sanctions rather than face occupation by an invading American army.
Of course. That is why the US ruling class opted for war rather than sanctions. They were becoming ineffective. Wars are made by a class, not individuals by the way.
-- Marxism list: www.marxmail.org
- The West's pursuit of democracy in the Arab world, ken hanly Sat 07 Aug 2004, 14:57 GMT
- The New School of the Americas, ken hanly Sat 07 Aug 2004, 14:43 GMT
- Al Gore for overthrow of Saddam Hussein in 2000, Louis Proyect Sat 07 Aug 2004, 12:45 GMT
- Re: Al Gore for overthrow of Saddam Hussein in 2000, Marvin Gandall Sat 07 Aug 2004, 14:47 GMT
- Re: Al Gore for overthrow of Saddam Hussein in 2000, Louis Proyect Sat 07 Aug 2004, 14:51 GMT
- Re: Al Gore for overthrow of Saddam Hussein in 2000, Marvin Gandall Sat 07 Aug 2004, 16:01 GMT
- Re: Al Gore for overthrow of Saddam Hussein in 2000, Louis Proyect Sat 07 Aug 2004, 16:14 GMT
- re PPP comparisons, michael a. lebowitz Sat 07 Aug 2004, 11:17 GMT
- Tariq Ali on the US election, Marvin Gandall Sat 07 Aug 2004, 00:54 GMT