PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
nader to lobbyist
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: nader to lobbyist
- From: Dan Scanlan <dscanlan@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 18:38:50 -0700
- Comments: RFC822 error: <W> Incorrect or incomplete address field found and ignored.
Title: nader to lobbyist
Nader Tells Toby
Moffett: "Stop making false statements concerning allegations of
Republican support."
Rebuts False Allegations of Republican Support
Describes Moffett As a "Corporate Lobbyist," Not a Nader's
Raider
Moffett is Part of the Problem of Corporate Control of Government
Urges Kerry/Edwards to Debate Nader/Camejo on the Issues
August 5, 2004
Anthony J. (Toby) Moffett
The Livingston Group
499 South Capitol St SW # 600
Washington, DC 20003
Dear Mr. Moffett:
I am writing to request that you stop making false statements
concerning allegations of Republican support for the Nader/Camejo
Campaign. I have said repeatedly that I am seeking votes and support
from Republicans who support my candidacy, but not from Republicans,
organized or otherwise, seeking to use my campaign for manipulative
purposes. As you well know, your Democratic Party has taken many
millions of dollars from favor-seeking Republicans hedging both sides
of the party aisles.
In fact, 2000 exit polls showed that approximately 25% of those who
voted for the Green ticket were registered Republicans. Over the
years I have worked with individual Republicans on issues of mutual
concern - e.g. securities fraud, environmental protection,
corporate crime, and corporate welfare. In addition, many people
supporting our candidacy in 2004 supported President Bush in 2000,
including members of the Reform Party. Indeed, many people who
supported President Bush in 2000 are not happy with the Patriot
Act's undermining of the Constitution, the fabrications and lies
that led to war, the record budget deficits, the sovereignty
infringing trade agreements, outsourcing of jobs, and a host of other
issues. So, it is not surprising that 5% of our major donors are
Republicans.
Regarding support from Republicans helping to get Nader/Camejo on the
ballot: the three most common claims come from Michigan, Nevada and
Oregon - all three are false. In Michigan, our campaign turned in
our signatures to protect our rights in court because we have been
endorsed by the Reform Party, which has a ballot line. The
signature-gathering campaign by others was not consistent with our
strategy, and we had nothing to do with it.
In Nevada, there were unsubstantiated allegations that Steve Wark
helped our campaign get on the ballot. However, we have never had any
contact with Mr. Wark, never received any donations from him, and
neither has our signature gathering firm. This is a story that is
unsubstantiated, and, as best we can see, completely false.
In Oregon, the most important activity of a major party was the
Democrats spoiling our ballot access convention by organizing and
sending Democrats in - to fill out the auditorium, undermine the
convention by swelling the numbers, and then not sign the petitions.
While there was talk of Republican support in the media, we saw no
evidence of it on the ground.
It is amazing that the media still describes you as a
Nader's-Raider - Toby, that was thirty years ago. Today, you are
a corporate lobbyist with a firm whose clients are military
contractors, telecom giants, and industry trade associations. You
were a former vice president with Monsanto and now are a partner with
Robert Livingston, a reactionary Republican who was about to serve as
the Speaker of the House until he resigned. If the media focused on
who you really are - a corporate lobbyist - it would not be
surprising that you oppose our candidacy , since our focus is
challenging the corporate domination of Washington, DC and its
erosive impact on domestic and foreign policy.
While Nader/Camejo would be happy to debate your candidates - John
Kerry and John Edwards - on the issues, I reject your falsehoods,
which are part of a coordinated Democratic dirty tricks campaign to
keep Nader/Camejo off the ballot. Stop knowingly misleading the
public and stop trying to undermine democracy by limiting the choice
of voters to two candidates representing, in varying degrees, two
corporate political parties.
Sincerely,
Ralph Nader
- Thread context:
- Re: Whither the Fed?, (continued)
- Arguments for progressive taxation,
Bill Lear Fri 06 Aug 2004, 16:09 GMT
- Poletown decision overturned - Brush Park residents elated,
Charles Brown Fri 06 Aug 2004, 13:55 GMT
- Economics and law,
Charles Brown Fri 06 Aug 2004, 12:36 GMT
- nader to lobbyist,
Dan Scanlan Fri 06 Aug 2004, 01:50 GMT
- interesting reading,
Dan Scanlan Fri 06 Aug 2004, 01:41 GMT
- SUVs are illegal in many parts of the California,
Devine, James Fri 06 Aug 2004, 01:35 GMT
- new bushism,
Dan Scanlan Fri 06 Aug 2004, 01:29 GMT
- autism book.,
Devine, James Fri 06 Aug 2004, 00:49 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]