PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Walmart costs California
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Walmart costs California
- From: "Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 20:07:07 -0700
- Thread-index: AcR5Y89sPhtAQOByQ26U3L+p3TUsZwAbFEB1
- Thread-topic: [PEN-L] Walmart costs California
>Wal-Mart questioned the validity of the report, saying the authors
undervalued the wages and benefits the chain's employees receive.
The UC report comes from the Berkeley Labor Center, an institute that is
openly supportive of union causes. Although its researchers have in the past
accepted funding from the grocery workers' union to conduct studies, this
report was not funded by labor, its authors said.<
"_openly_ supportive of union causes"? do they ever say "openly
supportive of corporate causes"? is Labor is such bad shape that
it's a market of shame to support it?
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Thread context:
- Re: Jon Stewart versus Ted Koppel, (continued)
- Elementary school question,
Charles Brown Tue 03 Aug 2004, 14:19 GMT
- new Rape situation,
Charles Brown Tue 03 Aug 2004, 14:18 GMT
- Walmart costs California,
ken hanly Tue 03 Aug 2004, 14:11 GMT
- Fiske on Iraq,
ken hanly Tue 03 Aug 2004, 14:05 GMT
- Information from Beyond: Norman Bethune is Shocked & Appalled,
Hari Kumar Tue 03 Aug 2004, 12:28 GMT
- First unionised walmart?,
ken hanly Tue 03 Aug 2004, 05:02 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]