PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: No Bounce for Kerry
ken hanly wrote:
>
> Well I think that Plato argued it a bit earlier..in The Republic..
>
:-) Yup. My post was a bit ambiguous -- pronoun reference not clear. I
was thinking primarily of the DP rather than the general principle re "a
great Beast." Whether the DP leadership reads Plato or not I do not
know, but I suspect they remember the '30s and '60s well enough not to
need specific guidance from him. I think Zinn argues specifically that
the DP has existed above all to keep the Beast down, but I'm not sure.
Carrol
ken hanly wrote:
>
Carrol wrote:
> >
> > The alternative strategy would be to arouse public passion (and
> > participation!). It has long been my own theory that the DP leadership
> > would always choose losing rather than risk such arousal. The Public is
> > a great Beast, and dangerous when aroused. (I think Zinn argues this
> > someplace, but I'm not sure of my memory on this.)
> >
> > Carrol
- Thread context:
- Re: No Bounce for Kerry, (continued)
- Re: No Bounce for Kerry,
Michael Hoover Tue 03 Aug 2004, 04:24 GMT
- No bounce for Kerry,
Louis Proyect Tue 03 Aug 2004, 18:14 GMT
- Re: No bounce for Kerry,
Carl Remick Tue 03 Aug 2004, 18:25 GMT
- Re: No bounce for Kerry,
Devine, James Tue 03 Aug 2004, 19:14 GMT
- Re: No Bounce for Kerry,
Michael Hoover Tue 03 Aug 2004, 19:32 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]