Re: Kerry's a better choice for some conservatives

[Michael Hoover <hooverm@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>>> cbcox@xxxxxxxxx 07/29/04 11:32 PM >>>
Dan Scanlan wrote:
>> The Right Wing's Deep, Dark Secret
>    Some hope for a Bush loss, and here's why
>   By John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge

We (people, leftists, left liberals) made significant gains under Nixon
(despite his intentions) because we had behind us the threatening mass
movements of the '60s.
Leftists _must_ break, permanently and unambiguously, all ties to the DP
-- and this includes the leftists of the DP (Wellstone, Obama,
Hightower), who achieve nothing for us except symbolic gestures but
provide cover for the party's left flank.
Carrol
<<<<<>>>>>

come on, 'we' have chance in 04 to return 'liberal' jfk to prez, surely
you recall last time he was in office - civil rights advocate, pro
labor, tax wealthy - oh wait, he didn't actually initiate legal action
in any antidiscrimination cases, he appointed segregationists to federal
bench, he offered little help to civil rights activists attacked - and
killed - by racists, he opposed increases in minimum wage, he sought to
constrain wage demands by unions, he opposed reducing work week, he
presided over tax cuts for rich and corporations...

back to yesterday with jfk...   michael hoover


--------------------------------------------------------------
Please Note:
Due to Florida's very broad public records law, most written communications to or from College employees
regarding College business are public records, available to the public and media upon request.
Therefore, this e-mail communication may be subject to public disclosure.