PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Israel pushing for Kurdish state? -
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Israel pushing for Kurdish state? -
- From: ravi <gadfly@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:52:34 -0400
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616
Ulhas Joglekar wrote:
> ravi wrote: Kashmir:
>
>>> a US protectorate in reality.
>
>> then our duty is not to deny the former, but to fight the latter,
>> isn't it?
>
> How do you fight the latter?
>
isn't the answer to that question what the broader context of this list
is? or at least the humanist left is? i am hardly qualified to answer
the question in any sufficient sense, but i think there are answers
available... in the writings, recommendations and actions of various
people (thoreau, gandhi, mlk, chomsky, feyerabend, ...).
> Btw, do CPI and CPM share your positions?
i do not have a position, at least on kashmir, other than this: the
wishes of the population need to be ascertained and honored in some
manner that is satisfactory to them. i am not sure what the positions of
the CPI and CPM are, since i am not a communist.
the following provides some information:
http://www.indianexpress.com/ie/daily/20000809/ian09065.html
> Wary of a communal division of Jammu and Kashmir gaining acceptance
> among political circles and an increasing role for the US in the
> Valley, the Left parties stress on more autonomy for the state.
> AMRITH LAL analyses the position
>
> The position of the Indian mainstream Left on the Kashmir issue has
> been consistent right from the 1940s. The Left has always espoused
> the peculiar position of the state within the Indian union and the
> need to give it maximum autonomy.
which seems like a good start to me.
--ravi
- Thread context:
- Re: Israel pushing for Kurdish state? -, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]