PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
intramural cynicism
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: intramural cynicism
- From: Dan Scanlan <dscanlan@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 11:22:02 -0700
- Comments: RFC822 error: <W> Incorrect or incomplete address field found and ignored.
Title: intramural cynicism
From the Denver
Post:
Bill Clinton
defended his embattled national security adviser Tuesday as a man who
"always got things right," even if his desk was a
mess.
....
Clinton
said he has known about the federal probe of Berger's actions for
several months, calling this week's news a
"nonstory."
"I wish I
knew who leaked it. It's interesting timing," he
added.
...
In an
interview with The Denver Post, Clinton questioned the timing of the
Berger flap less than a week before the Democratic National
Convention and two days before a presidential commission is slated to
release its final report on the Bush administration's handling of the
Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
--------------------
From Dan
Scanlan,
If anyone should
know of manipulating the American sheeple, its Clinton. It's the
timing, stupid. Put your blue dress on and bomb Afghanistan and
The Sudan.
Let me gloat.
From the same article:
"Clinton
derided the Bush administration for its move this month to give
states the opportunity to allow millions of acres of national forests
to be opened up for logging, energy development and road building.
The plan could affect 4.3 million acres of federal land in
Colorado.
""This decision will doubtless make some economic interests
happy," he said. "By giving 100 percent of it back to the
states, they really put it all at risk. ... There is no national
policy here except to let the developers persuade whatever governors
and state legislatures they can persuade. It's like saying these are
state forests, not national forests."
"Clinton's
administration designated or expanded 22 national monuments and
banned road building and development in 60 million acres of national
forest. He called his record on the environment "one of the
least appreciated or sort of best parts of my eight
years."
"Differences between the environmental and energy policies of
presidential challenger John Kerry and Bush are among the starkest in
this year's election, he added.
""One
of the things the American people will have to decide in this
election is whether they want a strong environmental policy,"
said Clinton, who is using his book tour partly to plug Kerry, a
fellow Democrat. "The choice, I'd say, is pretty
clear.""
-------------
When Clinton
expanded the 22 national monuments etc. at the very end of his
administration (at the same time he was pardoning major contributors,
as I recall) I suggested in writing that he was merely setting the
stage for claiming to be an environmentalist sometime in the future,
knowing damn well that the following administration could and would
easily overturn his meaningless executive order. It didn't mean shit
then and it sure doesn't mean shit now -- except that it affords a
glimpse into the cynical and callous manipulations of our company
store-bought style of politician, of which Clinton and Kerry are
poster-child models.
Dan
Scanlan
- Thread context:
- Re: Bush-Hitler: Hypnotizing the Masses, (continued)
- Howard Zinn: You Can't Be Neutral on a Moving Train clarification,
Louis Proyect Wed 21 Jul 2004, 20:47 GMT
- Wages of Election-Year Rituals,
Yoshie Furuhashi Wed 21 Jul 2004, 19:14 GMT
- Howard Zinn: You Can't Be Neutral on a Moving Train,
Louis Proyect Wed 21 Jul 2004, 19:10 GMT
- intramural cynicism,
Dan Scanlan Wed 21 Jul 2004, 18:28 GMT
- Beeps, Peeps, Veeps, & Creeps,
Michael Hoover Wed 21 Jul 2004, 16:55 GMT
- United Nations Human Indicators Index 2004,
Louis Proyect Wed 21 Jul 2004, 16:48 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]