Re: Thomas Frank op-ed piece

[Daniel Davies <dsquared@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In fairness, Kerry has never denied having blood on his hands and has done
more than most (indeed, has built his political career on it) to bring the
facts about what US soldiers did in Vietnam into the public eye.

dd

-----Original Message-----
From: PEN-L list [mailto:PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Craven, Jim
Sent: 21 July 2004 02:55
To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Thomas Frank op-ed piece

No, Bush has blood on his hands for supporting the war while
refusing to go, while Kerry has blood on his hands (as did all veterans
who directly or indirectly participated in the Vietnam War--including
me) for having reservations about it but going anyway-