Re: oops factor

To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: oops factor
From: Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 12:02:37 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

I mentioned something like this, but not as nasty a technique, a couple of weeks ago.
My question then was how does this show up in the data, except as part of profits.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu

References:
- oops factor
  - From: Dan Scanlan

Prev by Date: Re: Venture Communism
Next by Date: Can Tulipmania be explained rationally as the birth of options?
Previous by thread: oops factor
Next by thread: Re: oops factor
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Can Tulipmania be explained rationally as the birth of options?, (continued)
  - Re: Can Tulipmania be explained rationally as the birth of options?, Daniel Davies Sun 18 Jul 2004, 11:37 GMT
  - Re: Can Tulipmania be explained rationally as the birth of options?, Perelman, Michael Sun 18 Jul 2004, 20:13 GMT
    - Re: Can Tulipmania be explained rationally as the birth of options?, Daniel Davies Sun 18 Jul 2004, 22:12 GMT
- oops factor, Dan Scanlan Sat 17 Jul 2004, 17:56 GMT
  - Re: oops factor, Michael Perelman Sat 17 Jul 2004, 19:02 GMT
  - Re: oops factor, Gil Skillman Sun 18 Jul 2004, 02:32 GMT
    - Re: oops factor, Dan Scanlan Sun 18 Jul 2004, 18:04 GMT
- Re: Venture Communism/morped/ Socialism Betrayed, Waistline2 Sat 17 Jul 2004, 16:38 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Venture Communism/morped/ Socialism Betrayed, Charles Brown Sun 18 Jul 2004, 15:40 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]