PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Hawking black hole
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Hawking black hole
- From: Dan Scanlan <dscanlan@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:12:52 -0700
- Comments: RFC822 error: <W> Incorrect or incomplete address field found and ignored.
Title: Hawking black hole
NewScientist.com
Hawking cracks
black hole paradox
19:00 14 July
04
Exclusive from
New Scientist Print Edition.
After nearly 30 years of arguing that a black hole destroys
everything that falls into it, Stephen Hawking is saying he was
wrong. It seems that black holes may after all allow information
within them to escape. Hawking will present his latest finding at a
conference in Ireland next week.
The about-turn might cost Hawking, a physicist at the University of
Cambridge, an encyclopaedia because of a bet he made in 1997. More
importantly, it might solve one of the long-standing puzzles in
modern physics, known as the black hole information paradox.
It was Hawking's own work that created the paradox. In 1976, he
calculated that once a black hole forms, it starts losing mass by
radiating energy. This "Hawking radiation" contains no
information about the matter inside the black hole and once the black
hole evaporates, all information is lost.
But this conflicts with the laws of quantum physics, which say that
such information can never be completely wiped out. Hawking's
argument was that the intense gravitational fields of black holes
somehow unravel the laws of quantum physics.
Other physicists have tried to chip away at this paradox. Earlier in
2004, Samir Mathur of Ohio State University in Columbus and his
colleagues showed that if a black hole is modelled according to
string theory - in which the universe is made of tiny, vibrating
strings rather than point-like particles - then the black hole
becomes a giant tangle of strings. And the Hawking radiation emitted
by this "fuzzball" does contain information about the
insides of a black hole (New Scientist print edition, 13 March).
Big reputation
Now, it seems that Hawking too has an answer to the conundrum and the
physics community is abuzz with the news. Hawking requested at the
last minute that he be allowed to present his findings at the 17th
International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation in
Dublin, Ireland.
"He sent a note saying 'I have solved the black hole information
paradox and I want to talk about it'," says Curt Cutler, a
physicist at the Albert Einstein Institute in Golm, Germany, who is
chairing the conference's scientific committee. "I haven't seen
a preprint [of the paper]. To be quite honest, I went on Hawking's
reputation."
Though Hawking has not yet revealed the detailed maths behind his
finding, sketchy details have emerged from a seminar Hawking gave at
Cambridge. According to Cambridge colleague Gary Gibbons, an expert
on the physics of black holes who was at the seminar, Hawking's black
holes, unlike classic black holes, do not have a well-defined event
horizon that hides everything within them from the outside world.
In essence, his new black holes now never quite become the kind that
gobble up everything. Instead, they keep emitting radiation for a
long time, and eventually open up to reveal the information within.
"It's possible that what he presented in the seminar is a
solution," says Gibbons. "But I think you have to say the
jury is still out."
Forever hidden
At the conference, Hawking will have an hour on 21 July to make his
case. If he succeeds, then, ironically, he will lose a bet that he
and theoretical physicist Kip Thorne of the California Institute of
Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena made with John Preskill, also of
Caltech.
They argued that "information swallowed by a black hole is
forever hidden, and can never be revealed".
"Since Stephen has changed his view and now believes that black
holes do not destroy information, I expect him [and Kip] to concede
the bet," Preskill told New Scientist. The duo are expected to
present Preskill with an encyclopaedia of his choice "from which
information can be recovered at will".
Jenny Hogan
- Thread context:
- Re: A distaff view of SupersizeMe, (continued)
- Hawking black hole,
Dan Scanlan Thu 15 Jul 2004, 17:16 GMT
- Galbraith,
Dan Scanlan Thu 15 Jul 2004, 16:56 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]